|
August 21, 2011
When the licence fee went up in 1999 I took my TV to the local tip and throw it into the skip, and I haven’t owned a TV since then. I didn’t renew my TV licence in 2000. What was the point? Immediately, well in a matter of days, I received a letter reminding me that I hadn’t renewed, and if I didn’t I faced a fine of up to £1000. Charming! So I drafted a nice polite letter explained why I didn’t need a licence and I thought that was the end of the matter. WRONG. Ever since then I have received a constant stream of letters with “TV Licensing” on the envelope. At first I read their idle threats about what they planned to do to me, i.e., hefty fines, imminent court action, search warrants, firing squad etc. After a while I just put the letters straight into the shredder without opening them. The propaganda put out by TV Licensing portrays TV Licence evaders as criminals and scum of the earth. What you have to remember in all this is that it’s just about the entirely harmless act of watching television. Then it happened. One day there was a loud knocking on the door. I opened it to find a “TV Licence Enforcement Officer” standing there, pen poised over his clipboard ready to write down my response to his “Are you Mr Keith Smith?” That is until yesterday morning. I picked up a letter with the “TV Licensing” logo on it, so I broke the rule and opened it. The gist of it was “We have reason to believe that you are watching TV without a licence”, and then it went into the usual threats of court action, fines, and possible castration; sorry, I mean incarceration if I didn’t phone, write or email them by 26 August as to why I haven’t got a TV Licence. Here we go again, I thought, back to square one. I still haven’t got a TV, but I have bought a video cassette player which is interfaced with this computer for the sole purpose of copying my home movies to DVD. I went to great pains years ago to find out my rights in this case and the action I took was perfectly legal and I was within my rights.
10 Comments posted on "“You could be fined £1000″"
Comments:
Dumdad on August 21st, 2011 at 5:07 pm #
This is an extraordinary tale of harassment by the authorities. What has become of GREAT Britain? I’ve been catching up with some of your other blogposts like the TV cameras on the road one. How have we allowed so many of our hard-fought freedoms to be eroded thus? I was a boy cub too, and I carried a knife in a sheath when I went to the meetings. As did the other cubs. No one stabbed each other! I think there are still a majority of good, decent people in Britain but our soft, liberal stance on immigrants, other religions and criminals etc has come back to haunt us. I can’t believe it myself sometimes, after all these years I just can’t make the TV Licensing t**ts understand that I don’ t possess a television! I think they can’t get their heads around the fact that there a some people in Britanistan who don’t watch the telly. – Keith.
betsy on August 21st, 2011 at 9:30 pm #
Oh dear! Don’t they have anything better to do? Love that you took his photo. Yes, he looks quite surprised. I do agree that there is nothing worth watching on tv. We only watch news and sports these day…but certainly pay a hefty bill to be able to do it. I think you are right there Betsy. Like the police they don’t have anything better to do. The police have stopped me twice this year just to check the car and test me to see if I’m over the alcohol limit and the car complies with the MOT requirements. Both times they were disappointed on both counts. The TV people are the same, for twelve years they have bothered me, but I cant do anything about it except buy a TV Licence (£146 per annum). – Keith.
Anji on August 22nd, 2011 at 1:17 pm #
So they are still after you? Yes Anji, I must be one of the top people they harass now, and no matter what I say they will hound me for the rest of my days. Still, it’s entertaining and much better than watching the TV. They are pathetic and a constant source of amusement to me. It gives a purpose to my life in my twilight years just to annoy them. – Keith.
Winchester Daily Photos on August 22nd, 2011 at 9:47 pm #
Your post made me chuckle! Love the photo too. Hi, pleased to meet you at last. I love your blog, it brings back memories for me. If you run into Wendy (Ascham) give her my love. [She is usually in the Wykeham Arms at lunchtimes]. – Keith.
Pat on August 23rd, 2011 at 11:06 am #
Keith you did of course ask his permission to take his photo? Of course you did:) At the moment you can photograph anything in the public domain i.e., the street, parks etc. That means places and people, included the police at the moment, but that is about to change if Parliament decide. You cannot take pictures in a seemingly public place, i.e., shopping malls, private shops, supermarkets etc., without the permission of the manager or a person in charge. It is usual to blur out faces and number plates to protect the innocent. You cannot take pictures of young children anywhere unless a parent or the person responsible for them gives their permission.
Sarah on August 24th, 2011 at 12:16 am #
You have to have a license to watch TV? In other words, you have to pay to be brain-washed? Over here, it’s the taking of a picture of, say, a tram or a water tower, that will earn you the frowning attention of The Law.
helen on August 24th, 2011 at 7:34 am #
I thought you had to have a TV license if you were conected to the internet as you can watch tv through the computer, well you learn something new every day. You are right Helen, but I don’t watch LIVE TV on t’internet, I don’t even WANT to watch TV.
guyana gyal on August 25th, 2011 at 5:42 pm #
What are they going to do with all those people who will now stop pestering you after this post? Look at all the people who will now need employment, Keith haha. I know what I would like to do with them, but that’s naughty; and illegal. – Keith.
michelle in wellington, nz on August 29th, 2011 at 3:38 pm #
Useless bureaucracy – especially their top, overly tax payer funded, management – overall it will have cost their organisation well over 1,000.00 quid in admin work just to get to this point. “They” can’t recognise the complete lack of a BBC television receiving device? I’m astounded that you are still facing these hassles after 12 tv free years. Sending care and huggles (with Zebby Cat *LOUD puRRRRRumbling as well), Michelle *loud purring is his greatest skill – hopeless at hunting, climbing trees, defence against other felines, but, my goodness Zebby can pURRr. Not so good for His human when I’m trying to hear a good radio programme be it documentary, play, book reading, interview or a good music performance on radio – bless my rescue feline lad for his enthusiastic show of loud affectionate appreciation! Now, any suggestions for how to painlessly fit a cat with a purr-box volume control? sending care,plus some more – Michelle I should have mentioned that in the TV Licensing Twerps letter they stated that I will have to prove that I don’t watch TV (?). How stupid. What do I have to do? Point to an empty space in my lounge and say “That’s where the TV set would be if I had one, and that’s where I don’t watch TV”. Do you think they will leave me alone after that, or would they lock me away in an institution as being a danger to the public? – Keith.
Mick Slyness on October 4th, 2011 at 4:45 pm #
Keith, first time visitor to your blog and fellow Shiltonian. Stumbled across while trying to find out what the unseemly police brouhaha today was. You’ve already made me smile and laugh out loud you grumpy old curmudgeon. When I grow up I want to be just like you!! Post a comment
|
|