|
March 20, 2011
All our leaders and helpers were decent chaps and chappesses who wouldn’t dream of committing an offence against us or harming us in anyway. Nowadays we have the ‘Vetting and Barring Scheme’ composing of the ‘Criminal Records Bureau’ and the ‘Independent Safeguarding Authority’ , but more of that in a minute. When I was 15 years old I became a Senior Scout. At 17 I went into the Army, and when I returned to civvy life I was an assistant scoutmaster and when the scoutmaster retired I was the skipper of our local troop. Around 1965 the rot set in. The Scout Association began to relax the rules on the uniform, and proceeded to change everything over the years in the name of ‘progress’ until just before I retired the lads were allowed to wear everyday sweatshirts, jeans (ripped, and/or any colour they fancied) and trainers. This meant that the discipline at the meetings went down the pan. They were cheeky, rude and wouldn’t pay any attention to me or anyone else. They didn’t seem to want to learn anything about survival, camping, and trekking etc., all they wanted to do was to sit in the scout hut and play computer games all evening. At this point I bowed out of active scouting and joined the Scout Fellowship, which is an organisation consisting mainly of old scouters and helpers who wanted to help out with the local scout troops. A few years ago the ‘Vetting and Barring Scheme’ was set up because of pressure from the politically correct do-gooders who were concerned about the increase in paedophilia and child abuse at that time. This meant that the Scout Leaders, helpers, in fact anyone who was connected with the Scouts, Guides and youth groups had to be checked out to see if they had a murky past or not. This scheme also extended to the Scout Fellowship and I was told that I couldn’t work with children or vulnerable people anymore until I was checked out under the Vetting and Barring Scheme. As you can imagine this upset me quite a bit, not because I had anything to hide; I didn’t. I flatly refused to be checked by the faceless wonders in Whitehall who probably had murky past histories themselves. I resigned, as did quite a few of the volunteers and leaders I knew. The result was that there were not enough adults left to work with the kids and three local scout troops closed down. One last word. If a person is scrutinised and found to be as white as the driven snow, and then allowed to work with children, what’s to stop him/her from going off the rails and molesting a child in the future? The Vetting and Barring Scheme is flawed from the start. Anyone with money, influence and a dubious past can probably get round it anyway.
6 Comments posted on "The Vetting and Barring Scheme 1"
Comments:
betsy on March 20th, 2011 at 6:14 pm #
I’m wondering if your “Senior Scout” is the same as our “Eagle Scout”! Do you still have your sash and patches?
Sarah on March 20th, 2011 at 7:59 pm #
Last paragraph: excellent point. Over here, we have a rule against hiring teachers who are out of the closet, gay or lesbian. Makes me want to gnash my teeth and foam at the mouth–the ignorance! And hatefulness! As if being straight or gay had anything to do with paedophilia. Grrrrr!
Pat on March 21st, 2011 at 11:07 am #
I’m tempted to say couldn’t you old stagers have swallowed your pride, indignation etc to save the scout packs but I do sympathise and share your outrage.
helen on March 21st, 2011 at 5:01 pm #
On your last point what about those who have just never been found out?
Keith on March 22nd, 2011 at 3:10 pm #
Betsy: I don’t know what the equivalent to Senior Scout is in the Colonies (!), but here it is Venture Scout. Sarah: It’s the same here in some schools. If a teacher is found out to be a Nationalist or an active patriot they are soon shown the door! Patriotism is considered a bad thing now, especially as the classes are mainly mixed ethnic groups. Patriotism = Nationalism = British National Party = Nazi! (in the Govt’s eyes) I suppose they think that gay teachers will bring homosexualality into the classroom and patriotic teachers will teach hate for other races. As you say, what ignorance! Pat: As I said I, and others, have nothing to hide or be ashamed of, it is the implication by the ‘powers-that-be’ that I could be criminal or child molester that I resent; and I will not be subjected to interrogation by anyone. Helen: You hit on a point there. Four years ago I knew of someone (a youth worker) who had something really nasty to hide. He was proud of the fact that he had never been caught. So confident was he that one night, when he was drunk, he confided in me. I thought about shopping him to the police, but before I could take action he was killed in a motorway pileup on dark foggy night! Perhaps there is a God after all!
guyana gyal on March 24th, 2011 at 6:22 pm #
It’s worrisome all around, no matter which way you look at it. A child’s neighbour can molest him or her. Post a comment
|
|