|
November 15, 2010
Filed Under (Big Brother obsession, Depressing) by Keith on 15-11-2010
I always holiday in France where the food, climate and quality of life is so much better than England. The towns, villages and the countryside so much safer; so there is very little need for cameras on every street corner, but as soon as I drive off the ferry at Dover I am immediately struck by the number of CCTV cameras monitoring my every move until I drive out of the docks onto the main road, and even then there are cameras along the route. If I stop at a pub on my way home I am being watched on cctv. Practically every pub now have cameras in all the rooms watching what and how much you drink. OK, so they say they are for security and to watch for any anti-social behaviour, but what if the landlord sees on the monitor that you drank three pints of beer, and then phones the bobbies and tells them that you have just driven off the carpark? Yet while CCTV cameras proliferate, now numbering 4.4m in the UK – that’s more than there are Welsh people – latest figures back show what everyone has long suspected – that the bloody things don’t actually stop crime!
There are cameras in Wood Street Park monitoring the childrens play area to watch out for child-molesters and paedophiles, of which the authorities seem to think that Earl Shilton is infested with. Fair enough, I suppose that is one place where cameras make sense. One place where they don’t work is the Wood Street Carpark where a car was vandalised recently, and despite the fact that there are two cameras the vandals they were not seen. Since my post about that incident another car has been vandalised, but to date I don’t know if there were any arrests made. Nearly all the local shops, Post Office and Supermarket are bristling with cameras. I never feel lonely when shopping in the town, knowing that numerous nameless people are looking out for me. Private snoopers are being paid to monitor thousands of CCTV cameras from home via the Internet. Their job is to try to spot criminal behaviour on live feeds from cameras in stores and streets. If, for example, they see a shoplifter they send a text message warning the owner of the firm. It reminds me a bit of Nazi germany when the youngsters in the Hitler Youth movement were encouraged to report any anti-Nazi behaviour by their parents, friends and neighbours. Finally: (and you couldn’t make this up!) Cameras are being turned on the people paid to watch CCTV streams, to note which bits of surveillance footage they didn’t see. The system developed in Turkey uses webcams to track a person’s eye movements and can then produce an edited reel of footage that they didn’t see at the end of their shift.
8 Comments posted on "Big Brother"
Comments:
Pat on November 15th, 2010 at 3:34 pm #
If Orwell came back he would not believe it.
julia on November 15th, 2010 at 6:39 pm #
The whole idea creeps me out a bit but, I am really glad there are cameras in all of the hallways at my kids’ schools.
Sarah on November 15th, 2010 at 8:46 pm #
Definitely creepy. We here in Los Angeles have cctv at intersections where there have been traffic problems or repeated crime, but not to the extent that you describe. Also, our school buses have the cameras mounted inside to monitor the students; since there are not enough people (eyeballs) to follow the feed live, some cameras are activated at some times. The students never know when and they are somewhat reluctant to push their luck. Everyone around here has a cell phone with camera, and not afraid to use it. That is more of deterrent than any cctv, I think.
guyana gyal on November 16th, 2010 at 1:38 am #
What I’d worry about [if I were there], is whether or not there are cameras in the public loos.
helen on November 16th, 2010 at 6:15 am #
It wouldn’t be so bad if they actual did stop crime
Keith on November 16th, 2010 at 10:46 am #
Pat: Oh, I think he would. He would say “There, see, I told you so but you wouldn’t believe me!” Julia: That is another place, like the childrens play areas, that I do approve of security cameras. Sarah: If some dastardly villian is in the process of committing a crime and he sees you videoing him on you cellphone then you could wind up in hospital! GG: There was talk of putting tiny cameras in the supermarket loos here, but we were assured that they would only be looking at the door inside to catch the graffitti artists. Helen: A local firm put cameras, like the ones in the photo, all round their factory. The next morning they discovered that the had all been stolen in the night! Nothing showed up on the video tape in the office because the thieves covered the lenses from behind the cameras before removing them.
Bart on November 16th, 2010 at 11:42 am #
A couple of years ago I came to the UK to attend a seminar. It had been a while since I’d last been there, and the number of CCTV cameras was both stunning and frightening. It didn’t give me a more secure feeling – quite the contrary. A couple of years ago I was eating a hamburger in a restaurant in Belgium when my wallet was stolen. I was sitting right in front of a security camera, so I went to talk with the manager to see if they could hand over the tape to the police to identify the culprit(s). He told me that it was useless, because (a) the police are not interested in identifying small crooks and (b) there isn’t much to see on those images anyway. So what’s the bloody point? Why do we put up with all this costly nonsense?
johng on November 17th, 2010 at 3:26 pm #
Hell,Keith,someone’s got to keep an eye on you! Post a comment
|
|